Some comments about
my Bedini's SSG replications.
(January 11-09)


The circuits of  my 4 SSGs  are the J. Bedini's very circuits. No important modifications were done.
Initial Bedini CCT

The only modifications are in the resistor and the pot: 47 ohm and 5K instead of 10 ohm and 1k. I have also sometimes added some nice pins for connecting an analog. amp meter and a digital volt meter to monitor the input bat. These 'modifications' were not over my head...:)))

This initial drawing was stolen on the Internet.


My SSG1 is too cumbersome, IMHO. It does not use ball bearing, the analog amp meter is still  not wired (it needs some shunt calculation) and  the device deserves to be improved and more tested.  It nevertheless even has a functioning bicycle RPM 'cheated' meter and a lot of non still wired pins and switches!


My SSG3 is just a gadget/gizmo and draws too much amps.  The rotor  was made out  of an old computer disk. This "motor"  can charge output bat(s) while depleting the input one!. It also can fill  a big cap very quickly. I sometimes use it to show funy sparks and "screwdriver welding effect" when I short the filled cap. No 'OU' but boasting  provocation claimed  here!.

My SSG2 was the more tested device.


One typical behavior, while charging 2 bats is:


As you can see it could charge 2 bats but also strongly deplete the input bat!  The voltages are raising/falling after the device is stopped.

Is this 'OU' (Over_Unity = COP > 1)?

You can nit-pick ad infinitum:
- Yes: It is 'OU' because you can charge 2 bats while depleting only one!
- No: the bat voltages are not a good indication of the real charge!
- Yes: perhaps, but the device is doing some work along as acting as fan for ex (actually I also fixed a small computer fan on the axle).
-  No: these input/output only voltage measuremenst are useless. Show me your willie  maths! :)))
Etc...
Actually, the bats. were not in new condition. So the fight is not over...


In the SSG4, the rotor is not so well balanced and shows obvious 'rubbing' , but the bifilar coil is bigger  in comparison with  the others coils (SSG1, SSG2 and SSG3.).

I also selected a 2N3055 with a Hfe of about 120 (measured). Does it matter?

Did you ever check the Hfes of your 3055? Incredible the discrepancies.

Coils: L1 (small wire: 0.5 mm?) about 12 ohm. L2 (bid wire: 0.7 mm?) about 7 ohm. L1 and L2:  55 miliH.
Glued (core from) welding rods as core.
 


According to a first test, this SSG4 does not behave like the SSG2 that have the same rotor (same diameter, 6 same magnets, same recovered wind sensor parts, almost same design but less liberty for 'alignment' ).

After a pot. tuning I could get an amp consumption of about 75 mili amps. (without any tuning it could reach more than 200 mili amps).
The rotor runs slowly (I guess about 50/60 turns/min) but steadily.
The voltage of the 12 volts (4.5 amp/hour) single ouput bat is slowly but surely  increasing (as expected!)
The voltage of the 12 volts (4.5 amp.hour) input bat is stable (very good news!).

I already have observed this "apparent(?)  non depleting but increasing voltage input bat" phenomenon with my (unpluged!) window motor. BTW: this window motor does not work on a mere capacitor as (rightfully or not ) claimed by somebody!
.
This is on: http://freenrg.info/Window_Motor/My_Vids/

So: more to come. I have to test this new device.

BTW?
Did you check some Tesla's  patents?
At the first glance, I saw them as childish  (and old fashioned).
After  a  serious study I could  figure out that it was my own poor understanding of simplicity that was childish!..